deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Shop Similar Prints
This Print Not Available
more ▶

More from ~Nullermanden

Featured in Groups:

Details

September 20, 2008
314 KB
600×632
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 68
Favourites: 529 [who?]

Views: 8,519 (3 today)
[x]
:iconnullermanden:
Holga 003

First half of a portrait-project I was assigned in class. Only rule was, that the portrait should be taken in natural light.

Double exposure, not a manipulation.
Add a Comment:
 
love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 0 0 sad 1 1 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconroadmouse:
~roadmouse Jan 14, 2011   Photographer
Very cool double! I like the mood of the image.
Reply
:iconnoworthen:
Impressive :) very impressive. Well done.
Reply
:iconty-rolka:
~ty-rolka Aug 24, 2010  Hobbyist Photographer
amazing work!
Reply
:iconofsentimentexpressed:
i love this. the ghostliness of the figure in the background is perfect, and the slant of the tree really adds to the effect
AWESOME JOB :D
Reply
:iconkhiria:
~Khiria Jan 29, 2010  Student Photographer
this is absolutly great!
I adore it
Reply
:iconmydecember90:
~mydecember90 Aug 28, 2009  Hobbyist Photographer
hello ~ ..Great photograph .. you've been featured here
[link]
Reply
:iconperfectojohnmata:
my god this is fricken perfect? how exactly did you get this? ive tried double exposures with my holga but never achieved something so sharp as this. teach me=]
Reply
:iconnullermanden:
Just lots of luck, I guess! As you know with Holgas, there really isn't much technique to it :lmao:

But on a serious note: I enhanced it slightly in Photoshop, but all in all, it really just boils down to luck. One thing to keep in mind though, is where the dark and light areas are in your frame - like in this, I knew there was gonna be a dark area in the tree, and so tried to get the face to be over that area.

Does that make any sense? Like instead of doing a double exposure with a dark lower half and bright upper half in both pictures, do the second with a bright lower half and dark upper. Cause, you know, bright on bright = overexposed, and dark on dark = underexposed :P

Alright, I'm gonna stop rambling now :lmao:
Reply
Add a Comment: